Debt charge-offs not consumer payoffs reducing credit card debt


We’ve been hearing for the past 16 months that consumer debt is going down. Well, it’s not because people are paying off their debt more aggressively.Instead, we’ve learned it’s because credit card companies wrote down $83 billion of the $93 billion in credit card reductions. Consumer credit card debt declined by just $10 billion with most of that pay down in the first quarter of 2009.

That’s what Odysseas Papadimitriou, CEO and founder of CardHub.com, concluded after he took a closer look at the data from the Federal Reserve. Papadimitriou worked for eight years at Capital One’s credit card division before starting CardHub.com. He has his MBA from Duke University.
Papadimitriou questioned the numbers the Federal Reserve put out because, he said in a phone interview today, “They just didn’t make sense when you consider economic conditions.” He gave three reasons for his doubt:

  1. Credit card issuers raised rates “extremely,” meaning that more and more of a consumer’s payment would go toward paying interest rather than paying down debt.
  2. Record unemployment rates, which means fewer consumers can afford to pay down debt.
  3. Record bank losses.

“From my experience, when consumers pay more, their finances are healthy,” Papadimitriou said. He also added that we were seeing “record losses from the banks. That doesn’t go hand-in-hand with credit card payoff.”

To reach his conclusions, Papadimitriou looked at the Federal Reserve’s monthly G.19 Consumer Credit Report, which last week showed data that made December 2009 the 16th consecutive month that revolving consumer credit decreased. He compared that data to the Fed G.19 reports for 2009, which examines the quarter-over-quarter and year-over-year change in revolving credit. What he found was very telling.

In the first quarter of 2009, consumers paid down $64.5 billion in credit card debt vs. $17.6 billion in write offs. Banks must write off an account when it’s 180 days past due or when the consumer has filed bankruptcy. So write downs are done every month, Papadimitriou explained. He credits consumers for this pay-down for three reasons: tax refunds, year-end bonuses from work and a cutback in spending after the holiday season. That’s a relatively normal practice each year.

But after the first quarter of the year, the story looked very different. In Q2 of 2009, credit card debt stayed constant between Q1 and Q2. By Q3 of 2009, consumers had accumulated more debt, and by Q4, outstanding credit card debt had increased by almost $21.5 billion.

“No matter how much consumers want to pay down debt, if they don’t have a job, there’s not much they can do.” Papadimitriou added.

He thinks the economy has reached the bottom, though, and people are starting to find jobs and again be able to pay down debt, which is a good sign. Interesting enough, however, instead of paying down debt, the numbers seem to indicate consumers are in a good mood and spending again.

Papadimitriou said the country went into this recession with consumer spending out of whack and that a period where consumers show restraint is needed. But, he said “Consumers are falling back into this same imbalance, which isn’t good for anyone.”

Lita Epstein has written more than 25 books including “The Complete Idiot’s Guide to Personal Bankruptcy” and “The Complete Idiot’s Guide to Improving Your Credit Score.”

Recommended Reading

Tags: , , , ,

Buying those discounted flowers could lead to months of undiscovered charges


negative option marketingHave you ever placed an order with a company and then discovered a monthly charge was being made to your credit card? Or do you have such a long list of charges on your statement that you might not even notice you’ve been a victim of “negative option marketing?”With this type of marketing, you accept a merchant’s offer for a free product or service and then your billing information is used to enroll you in a subscription or membership offer you never signed up for.

Why do companies use this sleazy tactic? Because it’s the most effective way to bring new customers on board. According to testimony by Michigan Attorney General Mike Cox, fewer than 15% of consumers will sign up for a service if they get a solicitation, but that number jumps to 80% if they’re recruited using negative option marketing.
One such company using this less-than-honorable form of marketing is EasySaver, which has 139 complaints posted by consumers on PissedConsumer.com, consumers who say they were ripped off and starting getting billed for the shopping rewards service even though they didn’t know they’d signed up for it. (Easy Saver Rewards Service is one people sign up for when they become a member of one of the Web sites run by Provide Commerce. These include Proflowers, RedEnvelope, CherryMoonFarms and Shari’s Berries.)

A post on Pissed Consumer that tells consumers how to cancel their Easy Saver “membership” got 12,390 hits, so there may be many, many more who got hit with this negative option marketing. A consumer who posts under the name Lleg wrote, “I canceled as soon as I saw some bogus $1.95 charge coming from my checking account. Hopefully this will be the last I hear from them…”

Another Pissed Consumer poster named Leaner wrote in February, “I recently questioned my husband about a charge on our acct. He thought it was mine and I thought it was his. After doing research I found out through EasySaver/ProFlowers that this was something that we “supposedly” went through 3 steps to sign up for when purchasing flowers in order to get 15% off the next purchase. They agreed to refund the 6 months of charges that I’d first found. Several days later I decided to check past statements and found them dating back to Feb ’08! 26 months worth! They are refunding but only 12 months immediately and the rest in checks through the mail.”

Posts like this clearly show why you need to question any unknown charge on your statement, even if it’s less than $2. As Lleg found out, he could have been socked with a $14.95 per month charge, just as Leaner had, if he hadn’t canceled the service immediately.

Taking a closer look
To find out for myself just what type of warnings participating merchants offered to their customers about these monthly charge services, I started to place an order on ProFlowers. After choosing my flowers and starting my order, I was offered free shipping on my next order. All that it said on the page was “This order qualifies for a free shipping rebate.”

I had to click on that statement to find out that to get this free shipping offer, I would have to join FreeShipping.com. After scouring the sign-up page, I found, in small print, text that told me that these “Insiders Club” benefits would be billed at the price of $11.97 per month. Of course, I didn’t sign up.

Then I continued my order until I got to the point where they asked for a credit card. At the bottom of that page was a membership sign-up for ProFlowers, which, based on consumers’ complaints, apparently turns into a membership in EasySaver. I didn’t want to give this Web site my credit card, so I don’t know exactly what members see when they complete their order, but based on comments at Pissed Consumer, 419legal.org and the Complaints Board, most customers end up with a membership in Easy Saver.

When I went to the Frequently Asked Questions page on the EasySaver Web site, I found out how consumers get caught up in the scam. In question 6 about “How do they enroll” EasySaver says, “EasySaver Rewards is only available to active ProFlowers customers. To enroll, ProFlowers customer are presented with the EasySaver Rewards opportunity while activating their ProFlowers membership, while navigating the ProFlowers website, or during the cancellation process. All new EasySaver Rewards members are offered a $10 off bonus offer when they enroll. To activate their EasySaver Rewards membership, ProFlowers customers are presented the offer to join, members simply provide their email address, zip code, and click “Yes” to authorize.”

So customers looking for a $10 off bonus at ProFlowers end up signing up for memberships in Easy Saver that will cost $14.95 per month. Talk about an expensive bait and switch. If these same consumers also signed up for free shipping, they could get stuck with a second charge of $11.97 per month from signing up for FreeShipping.com’s “insiders Club.

I did call Provide Commerce, who operates EasySaver/ProFlower, for a comment for this story, but they didn’t return my phone call.

Unfortunately, ProFlowers and EasySaver aren’t unique. Their technique is used by many types of marketers. The FTC even has a prenotification option rule that should be followed, but often is not. This rule requires the disclosure of the following:

  • Whether there’s a minimum purchase obligation;
  • How and when you can cancel your membership;
  • How many announcements and rejection forms you’ll receive each year, and how often you’ll receive them;
  • How to reject merchandise;
  • Deadline for returning the rejection form to avoid shipment of the merchandise; and
  • Whether billing charges include postage and handling.

While some Web sites may be following this rule, many are not or are putting the required information in very tiny print at the bottom of the page.

If you think you’ve been a victim of negative option marketing, you can file a complaint with the FTC.

Just remember, almost nothing is truly free. If you’re offered something for free or you’re offered a discount, be sure you know what that offer is truly going to cost you.

Lita Epstein has written more than 25 books including “The Complete Idiot’s Guide to Personal Bankruptcy” and “The Complete idiot’s Guide to Improving Your Credit Score.”

Recommended Reading

Tags:

Whoopi Goldberg: Daytime’s new reigning financial guru?

Is Whoopi Goldberg the wisest financial sage of daytime television? Listen closely. If you pay attention to the things she most wants to talk about day in and day out on ABC’s The View, you’ll find some of the most sensible financial planning advice on TV.The cast of MTV’s Jersey Shore recently sauntered in to plug its new DVD. While her co-hosts fawned over their abs and hair, Goldberg wouldn’t indulge the egos of these people who live “in the thinnest layer of celebrity” (as she has put it). Instead, she demanded to know their financial plans.

“Where are you heading? You guys are going to grow a little bit older and they’re gonna look for the next youngest thing, so what’s your plans?”

The kids came up empty. Finally, Mike “The Situation” said he’d become an actor, but there was no Plan B.

You can imagine what our Whoopi thought of this. “Tell me you guys have a savings plan. That you’ve been putting money away.” The Situation said yeah, they had “a team of people that try to take care of everything for us.”

Whoopi pressed on: “But are you watching? Because you know, financial advisers are wonderful if you get the right people. Sometimes people get a little…strange.”

The next day, the guidos and guidettes were long gone, but Goldberg wasn’t done dispensing sound money advice in their absence. The Jersey Shore kids may be new to the world of money and celebrity, she said, but “it’s no excuse for bad planning.” This got her revved up.

“I’m sick of seeing athletes and actors and performers and folks who get screwed because they were not smart with their money,” she said. “When they’re this kind of young, someone should grab ‘em by the booty and say, ‘Hey!’” she said.

Guest after guest, Goldberg — who, it must be noted, won her Oscar for Ghost, that movie whose big moment was the levitation of penny — hammers ‘em over the value of a buck.

On Heidi and Spencer’s habit of signing things without reading the fine print: “You better get yourself together or you’re gonna be in the street!”

On the Octomom’s health bills: “How did you pay for it?”

On those “freebie” giveaways that TV shows have with their audiences: “If it’s over $600, you have to pay taxes.” (Thanks, Whoops! You just confirmed what I reported recently in WalletPop’s examination of TV show winnings.)

On teen credit: “All the stuff you wonder about: what they’re doing on the computer, are you aware of where they’re going, who they’re hanging with. If you have all that information, sure, give them a credit card. But if you don’t know, and you still can’t find out, you might want to hold off on that. Because 16-year-olds are very cute with a credit card.” Whoopi launched into an imitation of a free-spending teenager before concluding, “And you’re paying it, not the child!”

Meanwhile, talking over all that good advice, Elisabeth Hasselbeck interrupted to suggest you might want to give your teen a credit card — as a surveillance method to track their movements. Great. Counsel that’s both financially and ethically unsound.

Having a Plan B. Reading the fine print. Planning for medical disaster. Granted, her money advice is simple, but like all good wisdom, it’s clear and it’s consistent, and some days, it seems like all she really gets fired up about. When it comes to spinning gold-standard financial advice out of celebrity straw, that Whoops is someone to heed. Keep it coming.

Recommended Reading

Tags: , ,

Will other states follow Pennsylvania helping the jobless pay their mortgages?


Pennsylvania helps ward off foreclosuresThis is enough to make me want to move to Pennsylvania. The state will give you a loan of up to $60,000 to pay your mortgage and taxes to keep your house if you lose your job.

Whoever thought of this program, I am sending you cyber hugs. No, no, actually, I am nominating you for president. You feel the pain of the unemployed, the uninsured with the audacity to get sick, the recently divorced trying to stand on one financial leg in the greatest recession of all time.

The program, known as the Homeowners Emergency Mortgage Assistance Program, has been around since 1984. It was created, said director Daryl Rotz, because at the time a lot of Pennsylvania coal mines and steel mills were laying off workers and these long time Keystone staters were losing their homes and being forced to leave the state.

Without question, said Rotz, interest in the program in the past few years has skyrocketed. To qualify, you need to live in the home and have suffered a financial hardship due to circumstances outside your control. You also have to demonstrate a reasonable chance of being able to repay the loan within 36 months; they don’t seem to embrace those who have racked up large credit card debt. The 2010 loans are being made at 5.25% with a 10-year payout and the state assumes the position of second or third lien holder.

To date, 43,000 people have used the program and about 187,000 have applied and at very least, received counseling. The state has loaned out $456 million and received back $252 million. The rate of successfully avoiding foreclosure and repaying the state loan is about 87%.

Similar programs are in place in Delaware, North Carolina and five other states — California, Florida, Arizona, Michigan and Nevada — are investigating adopting like measures. And a recent, albeit vague, notice from the White House said that these five states would be getting an additional $1.5 billion to dole out in homeowner aid. The notice said the money would be given to state housing finance agencies to develop whatever programs were most helpful to home owners in those states. I’m trying to share the feds’ trust here, really, I am, but you see, the problem is I live in California, where the Los Angeles mayor throws a big old Oscar party on the same day he canned 4,000 city workers and told the rest of them to take a pay cut. The U.S. Department of the Treasury is supposed to announce the rules of the program shortly, as well as how much each state gets.

Not much of the stimulus package has been directed at helping the unemployed stay afloat until they can find work again. And mortgage companies have taken a hard line — often refusing to allow people who lost their jobs to refinance to a lower rate, even if that lower rate is currently being advertised to the population at large and the unemployed borrower has excellent credit and hasn’t been late on a single payment. The loan modification programs won’t even talk to unemployed borrowers unless the borrower falls behind on payments. So if you want help lowering your mortgage payment, you basically have to be willing to risk ruining your credit.

In Pennsylvania, when a borrower falls behind on their mortgage, the lender will send them a foreclosure notice with a list of housing credit counselors. The counselor gathers the information and helps the homeowner through the paperwork of applying to the state and several other foreclosure programs. Recipients of Pennsylvania state assistance receive $60,000 or 36 months of help.

Recommended Reading

Tags: